<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Photoshop Express goes truly social.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/05/adobe-photoshop-express-goes-truly-social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/05/adobe-photoshop-express-goes-truly-social/</link>
	<description>Asking the awkward questions so you don&#039;t have to.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron B. Hockley</title>
		<link>http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/05/adobe-photoshop-express-goes-truly-social/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B. Hockley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colinwalker.me.uk/?p=129#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Adobe is playing catch-up.  Their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hockleyphoto.com/blog/photoshop-express-revised-terms/&quot;&gt;crappy terms of service&lt;/a&gt; are still keeping folks away, and they&#039;re trying to get into a market which is already fairly well-established.  Flickr integration was a do-or-die maneuver.  They might manage to get a bit of market share amongst folks who want to make some basic quick edits, but any serious hobbyist or professional is going to continue to use offline image editing software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe is playing catch-up.  Their <a href="http://www.hockleyphoto.com/blog/photoshop-express-revised-terms/">crappy terms of service</a> are still keeping folks away, and they&#8217;re trying to get into a market which is already fairly well-established.  Flickr integration was a do-or-die maneuver.  They might manage to get a bit of market share amongst folks who want to make some basic quick edits, but any serious hobbyist or professional is going to continue to use offline image editing software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

